Your examination, the imaging you reasoned for, the injection consent and the return-to-play plan, Note Dr writes the full consultant record, ready to approve.
Get Note Dr free→Trusted from grassroots clubs to professional squads
Note Dr listens to the consultation as it happens. While you take the history, examine the athlete, reason out the imaging and talk through the plan, it writes the record in the background, so your attention stays on the patient and off the keyboard.
Imaging reasoning on record
Why you requested the scan and what you were ruling in or out, captured as you reason it aloud, not reconstructed when a query lands months later.
Consent for injection, recorded
What you proposed, the risks you set out and what the athlete agreed to or declined, recorded the moment you take consent for an image-guided injection.
The return-to-play decision, defended
The call you made, the reasoning behind it and that the risks were explained, the contemporaneous record legal analyses of brain-injury litigation report missing most.
A reviewed Note Dr record captures more of what a record needs to stand up to scrutiny, the history, examination, imaging reasoning, consent and the return-to-play decision, against the standards SEM consultants are held to and the gaps litigation keeps exposing.
Standards and analyses referenced: GMC Good Medical Practice (2024), the FSEM Professional Code (2025), the Concussion in Sport Group consensus (British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023) and legal analyses of the rugby brain-injury group litigation (2025).
Ask what you found last time, the imaging you arranged, or what the athlete consented to, answered in seconds from their own record.
Walk into the review already knowing the story, without trawling the notes.
When a presentation calls for it, Note Dr surfaces the published guidance SEM consultants work to, from GMC Good Medical Practice and the FSEM Professional Code to the Concussion in Sport Group consensus and SCAT6, with the source shown. It never tells you how to treat your patient; that judgement stays with you.
Want me to surface any guidance for this? You could ask:
Why sport and exercise medicine consultants trust Note Dr with a record that stands up to scrutiny.
★★★★★
My imaging reasoning is on record
I always justified the scan out loud, but rarely in the note. Now why I requested the ultrasound and what I was excluding is right there. When a query comes back months later, the reasoning is already documented.
★★★★★
Injection consent, never an afterthought
Consent for an image-guided injection was the part I scribbled last. Now the risks I set out and what the athlete agreed to is captured the moment we discuss it, which is exactly where my exposure sat.
★★★★★
The return-to-play call, watertight
Return-to-play is the decision people second-guess. Note Dr records the call, the reasoning and that I explained the risk, so the contemporaneous record stands up. That is the note litigation reviews say goes missing.
★★★★★
Concussion records that hold up
Every pitch-side concussion assessment now has the SCAT6 and the removal decision logged as it happens. With brain-injury claims hingeing on contemporaneous notes, having the record complete every time is a weight off.
★★★★★
Dual obligation, cleanly documented
Working for the athlete and the club, what I shared and what consent I had is recorded every contact. Prescribing checked against the prohibited list is logged too. My anti-doping records are finally watertight.
Every recording and record is protected by strong, independently assessed security and encryption.
★★★★★
Across a full clinic, pitch-side, injury reviews and screening, every record now reads to the same standard, with the imaging reasoning, consent and return-to-play decisions that used to live in my head. My notes finally match the work I actually do.
Dr Naomi CSport and exercise medicine consultant
Note Dr is an AI scribe built for the full breadth of sport and exercise medicine, from pitch-side concussion assessment to injury clinic, return-to-play review and pre-participation screening. As you examine, reason toward a diagnosis and set the plan aloud, it drafts the consultant record in the background. You review and approve every note before it is saved, and there is a free plan.
Yes — Note Dr records a pitch-side concussion assessment as the incident unfolds, capturing the mechanism, the SCAT6 or CRT6 findings and the recognise-and-remove decision contemporaneously, when there is no time to write. The immediate plan, the graded return-to-sport steps and the written head-injury safety-net are documented too, and you review and approve the record before it is saved.
Yes. Note Dr records the return-to-play call, the criteria met, the reasoning and that the risks were explained and consented to. This contemporaneous record is the element legal analyses of sports brain-injury litigation report missing most, so it is captured every time and approved by you.
No — Note Dr does not plug into an electronic patient record by design. It drafts the note, and you copy or export it into whichever system your clinic, club or hospital uses, from a private practice record to a team medical platform. Your imaging reasoning, injection consent and return-to-play decision are captured either way, and you review and approve every note before saving.
Yes — Note Dr documents a pre-participation screening as you work through it, recording the personal and family cardiac history, the examination, the ECG interpretation and the clearance decision with your reasoning. The musculoskeletal profile and any baseline measures for in-season comparison are captured in the same note, and you review and approve the record before it is saved.
Yes. As you explain why you are requesting an ultrasound, MRI or blood tests, and what you are ruling in or out, Note Dr records the investigation and the reasoning behind it. When a query arrives months later, the justification for every scan is already on the record.
As you set out what you propose, the risks and benefits and what the athlete decides, Note Dr captures the consent discussion: the procedure offered, the risks explained and whether it was agreed or declined. It is recorded the moment you take consent, so the record reflects the conversation you had.